Hare Krishna
Hare Krishna
Krishna Krishna
Hare Hare
Hare Rama
Hare Rama
Rama Rama
Hare Hare


















The Big Bluff

In the following passages we will shortly explain what we think about the Big Bang theory. In other articles you can read about this topic in more detail as well.

The deficiencies of the theory

After all, from the analytical presentations of the previous articles on the Big Bang, it  says the origin of this universe is beyond the competency of material science. Observing and testing the different energies and their interactions gives limited understanding of the phenomena. The creation of this material universe belongs to those incidents that cannot be observed, analyzed,  or be verified by experiment. 

Conclusively, the physicists, cosmologists, the astrophysicists (and the members of other sciences) are forced to rely on their own assumptions and speculations. Of course, there are some valid observations about our universe. However, it is very bold to make far-reaching conclusions regarding the origin of the universe. Through speculative logical steps, the cosmologists, who study the origin and the development of the universe, are trying to give an explanation how the universe evolved from its initial point up to its present state of existence. Actually, what they are certain that they know well is only their present partial picture of the universe.  

For example, the expanding nature of the universe is based on their observation of Red Shifts, or the reflection of light arriving from planets and galaxies. However, this expansion is not necessarily explainable only by the movements of different objects and does not prove at all that the world originated from an ignorant explosion.

In historical times, the theories about the origin of the universe changed many times. These include the present theories, which are being modified all the time.. Thus, we cannot be sure that the present understanding is correct at all. Moreover, it is right to believe that after some years and decades there will be some completely different theory. Therefore, why should we accept the present theory?

According to the observed laws of the physics, by passing of  time, the existing systems became more and more disorganized, except if locally, there would be a proper amount of directed energy-input that could stop and reverse the disorganization. According to the Big Bang theory the order is increasing during the time without any directed energy. How this could be possible?

Despite that, the Big Bang theories are not proven, yet  there are attempts to prove them as a naturalistic scientific fact, through scientific propaganda.

The Big Bang theory does not give an answer to the question: where did the preconditions for creation of the universe originate from? What was/is the source of the incredible huge amount of energy within the universe?

A cosmic explosion would produce an equally spreading energy in all directions creating only one homogeneous gas-ball.

The theory  does not give any answer  on the cause of order, complexity and the laws we can observe within the material universe. How could one explosion create order and not a chaos? How is it possible to justify that one undirected explosion could result in an unusually expected opposite effect, or in other words, an increase in information, order and such useful structures like stars and planets.

The consequences of the theory

In light of the above enumerated deficiencies we should not call the theory the "Big Bang theory" but rather the "Big Bluff theory'. The theory is so deep rooted in the society that many millions of people who are interested in the creation of the universe believe that it is a scientifically proven theory.

Due to the so-called authority of science, many people became atheistic, accepting the assertion that the origin of the universe is explainable without the need of a higher intelligence or God. Moreover, the strengthening of such an atheistic idea further results in a quick decline of human morality. The Big Bang theory and its proponents, and with a great probability that they don't speak the truth, become the preachers of atheism, causing a great ethical damage to humanity.

The Big Bang theory is an open denial of the existence of God, and an opportunity to leave out and reject His laws. Of course, there are some people who try to harmonize their faith with this theory; however, globally people are turning away from God and living a godless life. 

How do we explain that fact in spite of the enumerated heavy deficiencies the Big Bang theory established in the way of thinking in our society? According to our opinion, it is because it is one of the ideological means to maintain the hedonistic, consumer driven society not interested in God. Thus, it is in no one's interest to question this theory.

Alternatives

There are alternatives to the Big Bang theory however. There is a common declaration of all the religions that the material world was created by an unlimitedly great and intelligent Personality.  

       Accepting the Supreme Personality can at once solve many arising problems and explain all the questions regarding the existence of this universe.

We find that the most detailed descriptions about the Creator and the creation are in the ancient scriptures of India e.g. Srimad Bhagavatam.

Bhagavatam

According to the Vedic texts, the material world, as a lower energy is emanating from Krishna, the Supreme Personality of Godhead. The creation is also governed by His different personal expansion and energies.

The goal of this creation is to secure a place for those souls who turned away from the blissful association of the Supreme Lord, wishing to fulfill their own selfish desires. This material world is simultaneously a chance to  get knowledge about God, to learn to love Him, and to ultimately go back to His superior transcendental abode.  Which is a place of eternity,  knowledge, and complete bliss.










HOMEPAGE

SUBTITLES

The deficiencies of the theory

The consequences of the theory

Alternatives